Cellucor C4 is one of the most well-known pre-workout supplements that are available on the market. It has proven to be heavily effective at its job and it helped bring about the kind of results that people are after when they are working out. In every 5 gram serving, you are able to get a decent dosage of creatine nitrate, arginine, beta-alanine, caffeine, and Synephrine. All the necessary ingredients to help get you where you want. But there is a new product on the market which is by the same brand and it is by the name N O Extreme. It is a creatine free product but it has its own set of benefits, some say it is even more powerful than the C4.
The fact that it is creatine free does not necessarily mean that it has to have less strength in its formula. In some cases, less creatine means that the dosage in the formula when it comes to other substances may be higher. This is that case, people and experts who have researched this topic find that the NO is much stronger and more effective than the C4 ever was.
NO contains a serving size that is worth 10g, which is a decent amount for a pre-workout. The C4 may have more creatine, but the NO has a certain level of arginine that is not available in the C4. The NO also contains bet alanine, this is said to be a thermogenic stimulant rather than a regular one and the presence of amino acids in the formula helps the person consuming it to build muscle. All of these alternatives act as a sort of substitution for the lack of creatine and it more than makes up for it by making the formula much stronger.
Energy Difference
Both workouts have been known to give a decent amount of energy to the person that is using it. The C4 has L-Dopa and it also contains a considerable amount of B vitamins to the user. The NO, on the other hand, has been known to have more caffeine which gives the person more energy. The No also contains a decent amount of BCAAs and tree bark to create a stimulant formula that is well-rounded and effective for the user. When it comes to other ingredients such as vinpocetine, the concentration, and dosages for each of them is quite sufficient.
The oxovanadium and methyltyramine content in the NO is better and in a much larger amount. Who is to say that either ingredient even existed in the previous formula if you compare the C4 to the new and much improved NO. the formula has been worked upon by the company, in an attempt to make the formula much stronger and more effective than the C4 previously was. It is said to give you more worth for your money and it is an excellent alternative for people out there who prefer the lack of creatine.
Which is Better?
When you talk about which pre-workout is better, although the answer seems cut and dry, it may not be as obvious as you might assume it to be. Just because one is lacking creatine or has a higher content of some ingredients, does not necessarily mean that it will be good for your body in specific. There may be needs that you need to fulfill to have your body functioning at the most optimum level and you may not be able to fulfill them with one pre-workout and it may be effective when it comes to the second pre-workout.
It also highly depends on the kind of workout that you are willing to perform. Not every workout needs the intensity level of the NO. Some people out there may be working for a bulkier body and going for a more athletic body type, but that might not be the case for everyone. Some of the people who are looking for a good pre-workout may just be looking for something that will help them gain energy and assist them in losing those last few pounds that their body might be holding on to because of the lack of intensity.
When it comes to serving size, you may need to pay dire attention to the price. Regardless of the fact that the NO is superior when it comes to improving the performance of the user, the C4 still tends to sell more than the No in the market. The reason for this is that the C4 gives you 60 serving sizes as compared to the NO’s 30 for the same price. For people who are looking for a cheaper alternative, the NO may be the much better option. The C4 is literally half the price of the NO regardless of its effectiveness being lower.
The fact that some people prefer a lighter pre-workout also comes in to play because some people may be looking for reduced intensity and if they are getting it at a lower price, they might opt for the C4.
However, there are people out there who do not like to make use of creatine in any form because they believe that the substance is harmful to the body in the long term or they might not be looking to bulk up, rather they may just be looking to gain strength. In these situations, people may willingly spend more money on the NO.
Conclusion
At the end of the day, it is always better to do your own research and follow according to what you know your body needs. The routine that may be generalized may not suit your body type but it might suit someone else’s body type. There is a certain level of trial and error when it comes to pre-workouts because not everyone’s body types are the same. You may also need to check if any of the ingredients that have been made use of in either formula, you are not allergic to. This has been an issue in the past. Always take medical advice and follow through accordingly to avoid causing any harm to your body.
